Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jon Kessler's avatar

Oh Joe,

I heartily agree that this should be a moment for reflection. Military success creates new opportunities for Israel and for the diaspora. Now is a time for wisdom not pridefulness.

However, I really wish you had taken a more nuanced approach than this. How would you deal with the very realities that have led the Israeli people to back the Netanyahu approach over and over again, albeit by the slimmest of margins? Those realities are: (a) there appears to be no option where Hamas is dismantled as a military force and the suffering in Gaza doesn’t continue, just as would have been the case in Germany and Japan had their governments not yielded to unconditional surrender, (b) while the Arab League has taken a big step, Iran continues to support Hamas with the express objective of destroying the “Zionist entity”. In other words, you are asking Israel to accept a resurgent Hamas precisely because Hamas doesn’t answer for the welfare of Gazans. Why? Do you really think that’s right, or that it will alter the overwhelmingly negative view of the Jewish nation globally? I know there are no easy answers to these questions, and that’s why I am hoping very much that you will address them.

Keevan Morgan's avatar

Klein's position is exactly the position that a united Jewry needs to reject.

Any article that holds up Thomas Friedman as the guru (so to speak) of the Jewish community is off the rails to start. I remember when Friedman wrote from Jerusalem in 1996 or so during the then Intifada--you know--the one New York Mayoral candidate wants to globalize--the main tenet of which was suicide bombings. The theme of Friedman's article was that Israel needed to take more risks for peace even while enduring the bombings. But, Friedman disclosed, he was not staying in the King David Hotel as usual, because it was very possibly on the terrorist target list.

That pretty much sums up the Friedman/Klein position, which is that Israelis should die for their naive and self-destructive view, which blames Jews like Netanyahu they don't like for Jew-hatred.

And beneath the Friedman/Klein view is the usual snide elitism against darker skinned Jews. Friedman and Klein want to impose rule by the European Socialist Jewish elite. Nothing against that elite, who did so much to establish Israel, but so did Ze'ev Jabotinsky, the inspiration for Likud. And by the way, any government replacing Netanyahu is still going to be a right wing government, so although Friedman and Klein make Netanyahu, who just led Israel to victory after existential victory when nobody else could, the ogre, the Israeli electorate with a Sephardic Jewish base is going to govern on right wing principles. The "We like Israel, so long as it is a big kibbutz" view is gone forever.

The only problem in the War against Hamas and other Jew haters today is that too much of Israel--even the right wing--has a myopic view of the hostages. That myopic view is well-intentioned, but immoral. It is immoral to make many IDF soldiers to die for just a few hostages. Sure, soldiers are charged with protecting civilians, but at some point saving civilians is counter-productive and Israel passed that point long ago. Thousands and thousands of terrorists have been released from Israelis jails for the sake of a small number of people the nation loves but cannot allow itself to be destroyed trying to save. Israel is lowered to bargaining for bodies of dead hostages while sacrificing more casualties for the bodies. Life is the highest Jewish principle, but Israel is chancing the death of the nation by giving Hamas and other terrorists the opportunity to spread lie after lie about "starvation" that doesn't exist and justifying establishing a terrorist Palestinian State whose mission is to take thousands of Jews prisoners as soon as it can.

The answer is for Israel to kill all Hamas leadership and cadres as soon as possible and then feed the Gazans without Hamas, UN, Friedman, and Klein interference.

24 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?