Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Lou Sernoff's avatar

Why are you apologizing? You, Andrew Sullivan, Ruy Texiera and a few others made crystal clear your revulsion at the mere thought of Trump, but were also crystal clear about the things you thought the other team had gotten wrong. Now is the time to open your mind to the possibility that disaster does not lie ahead. What if he doesn't set up concentration camps and deport millions?Suppose he just brings the border under control, and instructs law enforcement to find and rid us of the bad actors who never should have been able to get in? What if he appoints a normal, albeit conservative, lawyer as Attorney General -- a non-Eastman, Clark or Giuliani -- who doesn't unleash law fare part 2? What if he knocks Putin's and Zelensky's heads together and persuades them that their respective maximum objectives are out of reach? What if he is better than Biden at persuading Bibi to "take the win"? May not happen, but is the alternative of resuming all-out resistance from the git-go a better idea? Where did goading the bear get liberals the last time around?

Expand full comment
Art Eckstein's avatar

I think a turning point in the campaign was Vance crushing Tim Walz in the VP debate on October 1. Walz was Kamala’s first major major public decision and it turned out to be a bad choice. In the debate, Walz was always looking down anxiously at his notes, befuddled, slow and, above all, weak. He didn’t seem a convincing president, if it came to that. By contrast, Vance was quick, smart and, above all, strong. He seemed a convincing president, if it came to that. I was surprised, in both cases. Wish it had been the other way around! I think Walz’s performance was one of the reasons Kamala’s campaign stalled. Not just because of Walz himself. Because of what it revealed about Kamala’s judgment.

Expand full comment
36 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?