Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Lou Sernoff's avatar

Trump seems to be doing all he can to support John Ellis's thesis that he can't grow his base enough to win. Yes, you can interpret his latest rant about NATO as being nothing new; just pay your fair share. But it's just as easy to say he's all for the tsars', Stalin's and Putin's notion of what peoples belong to Russia. There are, I think, a lot of people out there, particularly those of Eastern-European descent, who might agree with the former notion but be appalled by the latter. I have trouble imagining who he thinks agrees that Haley's husband's rotation overseas is an appropriate subject of derision.

Why does he do it? Some of his riffs may reflect a crude political cunning; some may just be an egotistical need to bugle his personal ignorance. Look at me, a billionaire Archie Bunker. What he doesn't get is that there is an ever shrinking number of ostensible supporters who will warn him he has no clothes.

Expand full comment
Curtis Chase's avatar

Joe, I’ve heard David Gergen, Chris Matthew’s and you tell me that a ray of hope in all of this is that the military vet members would form a centrist alliance that would at least ensure that the Congress would not abandon our allies and revert to the isolationist mentality that helped lead to World War II. Well, we are still waiting. Where is Gonzalez, the putative leader of the “With honor” caucus? If this is not the time for this caucus to step forward, then when??? The many insults that Trump has hurled at military people of all stripes should be disqualifying, surely deserving of a formal rebuke. Democrat though I am, there was much to admire in the old Republican Party, its unwillingness to fight for its existence is dispiriting.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts