Help me understand the logic of people who think a Trump win would be anywhere from not good to catastrophic yet still promote the idea that he “could” rather than “should” step aside and let an assured winner get the team over the line.
Help me understand the logic of people who think a Trump win would be anywhere from not good to catastrophic yet still promote the idea that he “could” rather than “should” step aside and let an assured winner get the team over the line.
OK, I assume the "he" means Biden. The thinking is that every last poll and focus group--every one--shows his age is a mortal problem. There is also the--outrageous to me--fact that people simply don't appreciate the good stuff Biden has done. The people are an ass, to paraphrase Dickens. Opposed to that is the possibility that the Dems--who have some very good candidates in waiting--could come up with a stiff breath of fresh air at the Convention. Sorry, I'm failing in my pontifical duties here...but I'm just not sure this will work. But I'm really concerned about Biden.
Apologies, I reread my post and realize that it is poorly constructed. I think it is ‘bleeding obvious’ Biden should step aside and give his party another chance to choose a candidate who the whole country, other than the MAGA nuts, could coalesce around.
In other words it seems anyone not advocating for ‘should’ step aside rather than ‘could’ step aside is taking an unnecessary and irrational risk.
So I think we agree, I just don’t understand why you are not unequivocal about that being the best decision for the party and the country.
Help me understand the logic of people who think a Trump win would be anywhere from not good to catastrophic yet still promote the idea that he “could” rather than “should” step aside and let an assured winner get the team over the line.
OK, I assume the "he" means Biden. The thinking is that every last poll and focus group--every one--shows his age is a mortal problem. There is also the--outrageous to me--fact that people simply don't appreciate the good stuff Biden has done. The people are an ass, to paraphrase Dickens. Opposed to that is the possibility that the Dems--who have some very good candidates in waiting--could come up with a stiff breath of fresh air at the Convention. Sorry, I'm failing in my pontifical duties here...but I'm just not sure this will work. But I'm really concerned about Biden.
Apologies, I reread my post and realize that it is poorly constructed. I think it is ‘bleeding obvious’ Biden should step aside and give his party another chance to choose a candidate who the whole country, other than the MAGA nuts, could coalesce around.
In other words it seems anyone not advocating for ‘should’ step aside rather than ‘could’ step aside is taking an unnecessary and irrational risk.
So I think we agree, I just don’t understand why you are not unequivocal about that being the best decision for the party and the country.